From 6a2d07f43ae7cfcb2eb30cf39751f2f7fed7ecc1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Yves Orton Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2017 13:19:55 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 3/3] fix #131649 - extended charclass can trigger assert The extended charclass parser makes some assumptions during the first pass which are only true on well structured input, and it does not properly catch various errors. later on the code assumes that things the first pass will let through are valid, when in fact they should trigger errors. (cherry picked from commit 19a498a461d7c81ae3507c450953d1148efecf4f) CVE: CVE-2018-18314 Upstream-Status: Backport [https://perl5.git.perl.org/perl.git/commit/dabe076af345ab4512ea80245b4e4cd7ec0996cd] Signed-off-by: Dan Tran --- pod/perldiag.pod | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++- pod/perlrecharclass.pod | 4 ++-- regcomp.c | 23 +++++++++++++---------- t/lib/warnings/regcomp | 6 +++--- t/re/reg_mesg.t | 29 ++++++++++++++++------------- t/re/regex_sets.t | 6 +++--- 6 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-) diff --git a/pod/perldiag.pod b/pod/perldiag.pod index 737d3633f6..644b814008 100644 --- a/pod/perldiag.pod +++ b/pod/perldiag.pod @@ -5777,7 +5777,7 @@ yourself. a perl4 interpreter, especially if the next 2 tokens are "use strict" or "my $var" or "our $var". -=item Syntax error in (?[...]) in regex m/%s/ +=item Syntax error in (?[...]) in regex; marked by <-- HERE in m/%s/ (F) Perl could not figure out what you meant inside this construct; this notifies you that it is giving up trying. @@ -6153,6 +6153,31 @@ for example, (F) The unexec() routine failed for some reason. See your local FSF representative, who probably put it there in the first place. +=item Unexpected ']' with no following ')' in (?[... in regex; marked by <-- HERE in m/%s/ + +(F) While parsing an extended character class a ']' character was encountered +at a point in the definition where the only legal use of ']' is to close the +character class definition as part of a '])', you may have forgotten the close +paren, or otherwise confused the parser. + +=item Expecting close paren for nested extended charclass in regex; marked by <-- HERE in m/%s/ + +(F) While parsing a nested extended character class like: + + (?[ ... (?flags:(?[ ... ])) ... ]) + ^ + +we expected to see a close paren ')' (marked by ^) but did not. + +=item Expecting close paren for wrapper for nested extended charclass in regex; marked by <-- HERE in m/%s/ + +(F) While parsing a nested extended character class like: + + (?[ ... (?flags:(?[ ... ])) ... ]) + ^ + +we expected to see a close paren ')' (marked by ^) but did not. + =item Unexpected binary operator '%c' with no preceding operand in regex; marked by S<<-- HERE> in m/%s/ diff --git a/pod/perlrecharclass.pod b/pod/perlrecharclass.pod index 89f4a7ef3f..a557cc0384 100644 --- a/pod/perlrecharclass.pod +++ b/pod/perlrecharclass.pod @@ -1101,8 +1101,8 @@ hence both of the following work: Any contained POSIX character classes, including things like C<\w> and C<\D> respect the Ca> (and Caa>) modifiers. -C<< (?[ ]) >> is a regex-compile-time construct. Any attempt to use -something which isn't knowable at the time the containing regular +Note that C<< (?[ ]) >> is a regex-compile-time construct. Any attempt +to use something which isn't knowable at the time the containing regular expression is compiled is a fatal error. In practice, this means just three limitations: diff --git a/regcomp.c b/regcomp.c index 2688979882..cb8409ed27 100644 --- a/regcomp.c +++ b/regcomp.c @@ -14609,8 +14609,9 @@ S_handle_regex_sets(pTHX_ RExC_state_t *pRExC_state, SV** return_invlist, TRUE /* Force /x */ ); switch (*RExC_parse) { - case '?': - if (RExC_parse[1] == '[') depth++, RExC_parse++; + case '(': + if (RExC_parse[1] == '?' && RExC_parse[2] == '[') + depth++, RExC_parse+=2; /* FALLTHROUGH */ default: break; @@ -14667,9 +14668,9 @@ S_handle_regex_sets(pTHX_ RExC_state_t *pRExC_state, SV** return_invlist, } case ']': - if (depth--) break; - RExC_parse++; - if (*RExC_parse == ')') { + if (RExC_parse[1] == ')') { + RExC_parse++; + if (depth--) break; node = reganode(pRExC_state, ANYOF, 0); RExC_size += ANYOF_SKIP; nextchar(pRExC_state); @@ -14681,20 +14682,20 @@ S_handle_regex_sets(pTHX_ RExC_state_t *pRExC_state, SV** return_invlist, return node; } - goto no_close; + RExC_parse++; + vFAIL("Unexpected ']' with no following ')' in (?[..."); } RExC_parse += UTF ? UTF8SKIP(RExC_parse) : 1; } - no_close: /* We output the messages even if warnings are off, because we'll fail * the very next thing, and these give a likely diagnosis for that */ if (posix_warnings && av_tindex_nomg(posix_warnings) >= 0) { output_or_return_posix_warnings(pRExC_state, posix_warnings, NULL); } - FAIL("Syntax error in (?[...])"); + vFAIL("Syntax error in (?[...])"); } /* Pass 2 only after this. */ @@ -14868,12 +14869,14 @@ redo_curchar: * inversion list, and RExC_parse points to the trailing * ']'; the next character should be the ')' */ RExC_parse++; - assert(UCHARAT(RExC_parse) == ')'); + if (UCHARAT(RExC_parse) != ')') + vFAIL("Expecting close paren for nested extended charclass"); /* Then the ')' matching the original '(' handled by this * case: statement */ RExC_parse++; - assert(UCHARAT(RExC_parse) == ')'); + if (UCHARAT(RExC_parse) != ')') + vFAIL("Expecting close paren for wrapper for nested extended charclass"); RExC_flags = save_flags; goto handle_operand; diff --git a/t/lib/warnings/regcomp b/t/lib/warnings/regcomp index 08cb27b00f..367276d0fc 100644 --- a/t/lib/warnings/regcomp +++ b/t/lib/warnings/regcomp @@ -59,21 +59,21 @@ Unmatched [ in regex; marked by <-- HERE in m/abc[ <-- HERE fi[.00./ at - line qr/(?[[[:word]]])/; EXPECT Assuming NOT a POSIX class since there is no terminating ':' in regex; marked by <-- HERE in m/(?[[[:word <-- HERE ]]])/ at - line 2. -syntax error in (?[...]) in regex m/(?[[[:word]]])/ at - line 2. +Unexpected ']' with no following ')' in (?[... in regex; marked by <-- HERE in m/(?[[[:word]] <-- HERE ])/ at - line 2. ######## # NAME qr/(?[ [[:digit: ])/ # OPTION fatal qr/(?[[[:digit: ])/; EXPECT Assuming NOT a POSIX class since no blanks are allowed in one in regex; marked by <-- HERE in m/(?[[[:digit: ] <-- HERE )/ at - line 2. -syntax error in (?[...]) in regex m/(?[[[:digit: ])/ at - line 2. +syntax error in (?[...]) in regex; marked by <-- HERE in m/(?[[[:digit: ]) <-- HERE / at - line 2. ######## # NAME qr/(?[ [:digit: ])/ # OPTION fatal qr/(?[[:digit: ])/ EXPECT Assuming NOT a POSIX class since no blanks are allowed in one in regex; marked by <-- HERE in m/(?[[:digit: ] <-- HERE )/ at - line 2. -syntax error in (?[...]) in regex m/(?[[:digit: ])/ at - line 2. +syntax error in (?[...]) in regex; marked by <-- HERE in m/(?[[:digit: ]) <-- HERE / at - line 2. ######## # NAME [perl #126141] # OPTION fatal diff --git a/t/re/reg_mesg.t b/t/re/reg_mesg.t index 658397ac27..08a3688e1d 100644 --- a/t/re/reg_mesg.t +++ b/t/re/reg_mesg.t @@ -202,8 +202,9 @@ my @death = '/\b{gc}/' => "'gc' is an unknown bound type {#} m/\\b{gc{#}}/", '/\B{gc}/' => "'gc' is an unknown bound type {#} m/\\B{gc{#}}/", - '/(?[[[::]]])/' => "Syntax error in (?[...]) in regex m/(?[[[::]]])/", - '/(?[[[:w:]]])/' => "Syntax error in (?[...]) in regex m/(?[[[:w:]]])/", + + '/(?[[[::]]])/' => "Unexpected ']' with no following ')' in (?[... {#} m/(?[[[::]]{#}])/", + '/(?[[[:w:]]])/' => "Unexpected ']' with no following ')' in (?[... {#} m/(?[[[:w:]]{#}])/", '/(?[[:w:]])/' => "", '/[][[:alpha:]]' => "", # [perl #127581] '/([.].*)[.]/' => "", # [perl #127582] @@ -227,11 +228,12 @@ my @death = '/(?[ \p{foo} ])/' => 'Can\'t find Unicode property definition "foo" {#} m/(?[ \p{foo}{#} ])/', '/(?[ \p{ foo = bar } ])/' => 'Can\'t find Unicode property definition "foo = bar" {#} m/(?[ \p{ foo = bar }{#} ])/', '/(?[ \8 ])/' => 'Unrecognized escape \8 in character class {#} m/(?[ \8{#} ])/', - '/(?[ \t ]/' => 'Syntax error in (?[...]) in regex m/(?[ \t ]/', - '/(?[ [ \t ]/' => 'Syntax error in (?[...]) in regex m/(?[ [ \t ]/', - '/(?[ \t ] ]/' => 'Syntax error in (?[...]) in regex m/(?[ \t ] ]/', - '/(?[ [ ] ]/' => 'Syntax error in (?[...]) in regex m/(?[ [ ] ]/', - '/(?[ \t + \e # This was supposed to be a comment ])/' => 'Syntax error in (?[...]) in regex m/(?[ \t + \e # This was supposed to be a comment ])/', + '/(?[ \t ]/' => "Unexpected ']' with no following ')' in (?[... {#} m/(?[ \\t ]{#}/", + '/(?[ [ \t ]/' => "Syntax error in (?[...]) {#} m/(?[ [ \\t ]{#}/", + '/(?[ \t ] ]/' => "Unexpected ']' with no following ')' in (?[... {#} m/(?[ \\t ]{#} ]/", + '/(?[ [ ] ]/' => "Syntax error in (?[...]) {#} m/(?[ [ ] ]{#}/", + '/(?[ \t + \e # This was supposed to be a comment ])/' => + "Syntax error in (?[...]) {#} m/(?[ \\t + \\e # This was supposed to be a comment ]){#}/", '/(?[ ])/' => 'Incomplete expression within \'(?[ ])\' {#} m/(?[ {#}])/', 'm/(?[[a-\d]])/' => 'False [] range "a-\d" {#} m/(?[[a-\d{#}]])/', 'm/(?[[\w-x]])/' => 'False [] range "\w-" {#} m/(?[[\w-{#}x]])/', @@ -410,10 +412,10 @@ my @death_utf8 = mark_as_utf8( '/ネ\p{}ネ/' => 'Empty \p{} {#} m/ネ\p{{#}}ネ/', - '/ネ(?[[[:ネ]]])ネ/' => "Syntax error in (?[...]) in regex m/ネ(?[[[:ネ]]])ネ/", - '/ネ(?[[[:ネ: ])ネ/' => "Syntax error in (?[...]) in regex m/ネ(?[[[:ネ: ])ネ/", - '/ネ(?[[[::]]])ネ/' => "Syntax error in (?[...]) in regex m/ネ(?[[[::]]])ネ/", - '/ネ(?[[[:ネ:]]])ネ/' => "Syntax error in (?[...]) in regex m/ネ(?[[[:ネ:]]])ネ/", + '/ネ(?[[[:ネ]]])ネ/' => "Unexpected ']' with no following ')' in (?[... {#} m/ネ(?[[[:ネ]]{#}])ネ/", + '/ネ(?[[[:ネ: ])ネ/' => "Syntax error in (?[...]) {#} m/ネ(?[[[:ネ: ])ネ{#}/", + '/ネ(?[[[::]]])ネ/' => "Unexpected ']' with no following ')' in (?[... {#} m/ネ(?[[[::]]{#}])ネ/", + '/ネ(?[[[:ネ:]]])ネ/' => "Unexpected ']' with no following ')' in (?[... {#} m/ネ(?[[[:ネ:]]{#}])ネ/", '/ネ(?[[:ネ:]])ネ/' => "", '/ネ(?[ネ])ネ/' => 'Unexpected character {#} m/ネ(?[ネ{#}])ネ/', '/ネ(?[ + [ネ] ])/' => 'Unexpected binary operator \'+\' with no preceding operand {#} m/ネ(?[ +{#} [ネ] ])/', @@ -426,8 +428,9 @@ my @death_utf8 = mark_as_utf8( '/(?[ \x{ネ} ])ネ/' => 'Non-hex character {#} m/(?[ \x{ネ{#}} ])ネ/', '/(?[ \p{ネ} ])/' => 'Can\'t find Unicode property definition "ネ" {#} m/(?[ \p{ネ}{#} ])/', '/(?[ \p{ ネ = bar } ])/' => 'Can\'t find Unicode property definition "ネ = bar" {#} m/(?[ \p{ ネ = bar }{#} ])/', - '/ネ(?[ \t ]/' => 'Syntax error in (?[...]) in regex m/ネ(?[ \t ]/', - '/(?[ \t + \e # ネ This was supposed to be a comment ])/' => 'Syntax error in (?[...]) in regex m/(?[ \t + \e # ネ This was supposed to be a comment ])/', + '/ネ(?[ \t ]/' => "Unexpected ']' with no following ')' in (?[... {#} m/ネ(?[ \\t ]{#}/", + '/(?[ \t + \e # ネ This was supposed to be a comment ])/' => + "Syntax error in (?[...]) {#} m/(?[ \\t + \\e # ネ This was supposed to be a comment ]){#}/", 'm/(*ネ)ネ/' => q, '/\cネ/' => "Character following \"\\c\" must be printable ASCII", '/\b{ネ}/' => "'ネ' is an unknown bound type {#} m/\\b{ネ{#}}/", diff --git a/t/re/regex_sets.t b/t/re/regex_sets.t index 92875677be..60a126ba3c 100644 --- a/t/re/regex_sets.t +++ b/t/re/regex_sets.t @@ -157,13 +157,13 @@ for my $char ("٠", "٥", "٩") { eval { $_ = '/(?[(\c]) /'; qr/$_/ }; like($@, qr/^Syntax error/, '/(?[(\c]) / should not panic'); eval { $_ = '(?[\c#]' . "\n])"; qr/$_/ }; - like($@, qr/^Syntax error/, '/(?[(\c]) / should not panic'); + like($@, qr/^Unexpected/, '/(?[(\c]) / should not panic'); eval { $_ = '(?[(\c])'; qr/$_/ }; like($@, qr/^Syntax error/, '/(?[(\c])/ should be a syntax error'); eval { $_ = '(?[(\c]) ]\b'; qr/$_/ }; - like($@, qr/^Syntax error/, '/(?[(\c]) ]\b/ should be a syntax error'); + like($@, qr/^Unexpected/, '/(?[(\c]) ]\b/ should be a syntax error'); eval { $_ = '(?[\c[]](])'; qr/$_/ }; - like($@, qr/^Syntax error/, '/(?[\c[]](])/ should be a syntax error'); + like($@, qr/^Unexpected/, '/(?[\c[]](])/ should be a syntax error'); like("\c#", qr/(?[\c#])/, '\c# should match itself'); like("\c[", qr/(?[\c[])/, '\c[ should match itself'); like("\c\ ", qr/(?[\c\])/, '\c\ should match itself'); -- 2.22.0.vfs.1.1.57.gbaf16c8