From 681900d29683722b1cb0a8e565a0585846ec5a61 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Florian Weimer Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 19:07:48 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] x86: Harden printf against non-normal long double values (bug 26649) The behavior of isnan/__builtin_isnan on bit patterns that do not correspond to something that the CPU would produce from valid inputs is currently under-defined in the toolchain. (The GCC built-in and glibc disagree.) The isnan check in PRINTF_FP_FETCH in stdio-common/printf_fp.c assumes the GCC behavior that returns true for non-normal numbers which are not specified as NaN. (The glibc implementation returns false for such numbers.) At present, passing non-normal numbers to __mpn_extract_long_double causes this function to produce irregularly shaped multi-precision integers, triggering undefined behavior in __printf_fp_l. With GCC 10 and glibc 2.32, this behavior is not visible because __builtin_isnan is used, which avoids calling __mpn_extract_long_double in this case. This commit updates the implementation of __mpn_extract_long_double so that regularly shaped multi-precision integers are produced in this case, avoiding undefined behavior in __printf_fp_l. Upstream-Status: Backport [git://sourceware.org/git/glibc.git] CVE: CVE-2020-29573 Signed-off-By: Armin Kuster --- sysdeps/x86/Makefile | 4 ++ sysdeps/x86/ldbl2mpn.c | 8 ++++ sysdeps/x86/tst-ldbl-nonnormal-printf.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 64 insertions(+) create mode 100644 sysdeps/x86/tst-ldbl-nonnormal-printf.c Index: git/sysdeps/x86/Makefile =================================================================== --- git.orig/sysdeps/x86/Makefile +++ git/sysdeps/x86/Makefile @@ -9,6 +9,10 @@ tests += tst-get-cpu-features tst-get-cp tests-static += tst-get-cpu-features-static endif +ifeq ($(subdir),math) +tests += tst-ldbl-nonnormal-printf +endif # $(subdir) == math + ifeq ($(subdir),setjmp) gen-as-const-headers += jmp_buf-ssp.sym sysdep_routines += __longjmp_cancel Index: git/sysdeps/x86/tst-ldbl-nonnormal-printf.c =================================================================== --- /dev/null +++ git/sysdeps/x86/tst-ldbl-nonnormal-printf.c @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@ +/* Test printf with x86-specific non-normal long double value. + Copyright (C) 2020 Free Software Foundation, Inc. + + This file is part of the GNU C Library. + + The GNU C Library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or + modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public + License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either + version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. + + The GNU C Library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, + but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of + MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU + Lesser General Public License for more details. + + You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public + License along with the GNU C Library; if not, see + . */ + +#include +#include +#include + +/* Fill the stack with non-zero values. This makes a crash in + snprintf more likely. */ +static void __attribute__ ((noinline, noclone)) +fill_stack (void) +{ + char buffer[65536]; + memset (buffer, 0xc0, sizeof (buffer)); + asm ("" ::: "memory"); +} + +static int +do_test (void) +{ + fill_stack (); + + long double value; + memcpy (&value, "\x00\x04\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x04", 10); + + char buf[30]; + int ret = snprintf (buf, sizeof (buf), "%Lg", value); + TEST_COMPARE (ret, strlen (buf)); + if (strcmp (buf, "nan") != 0) + /* If snprintf does not recognize the non-normal number as a NaN, + it has added the missing explicit MSB. */ + TEST_COMPARE_STRING (buf, "3.02201e-4624"); + return 0; +} + +#include Index: git/sysdeps/i386/ldbl2mpn.c =================================================================== --- git.orig/sysdeps/i386/ldbl2mpn.c +++ git/sysdeps/i386/ldbl2mpn.c @@ -115,6 +115,12 @@ __mpn_extract_long_double (mp_ptr res_pt && res_ptr[N - 1] == 0) /* Pseudo zero. */ *expt = 0; - + else + /* The sign bit is explicit, but add it in case it is missing in + the input. Otherwise, callers will not be able to produce the + expected multi-precision integer layout by shifting the sign + bit into the MSB. */ + res_ptr[N - 1] |= (mp_limb_t) 1 << (LDBL_MANT_DIG - 1 + - ((N - 1) * BITS_PER_MP_LIMB)); return N; }