|  | Home | Libraries | People | FAQ | More | 
      Performance measurements were taken using std::chrono::highresolution_clock,
      with overhead corrections. The code was compiled with gcc-6.3.1, using build
      options: variant = release, optimization = speed. Tests were executed on dual
      Intel XEON E5 2620v4 2.2GHz, 16C/32T, 64GB RAM, running Linux (x86_64).
    
Table 1.1. Performance of context switch
| callcc()/continuation (fcontext_t) | callcc()/continuation (ucontext_t) | callcc()/continuation (Windows-Fiber) | 
|---|---|---|
| 9 ns / 19 CPU cycles | 547 ns / 1130 CPU cycles | 49 ns / 98 CPU cycles |